Determination of the soil water repellency of the Mediterranean climate by the use of the mini disk infiltrometer. Case of the micro basin of Tifiles, Tenes, Algeria.
The soil repellency is one of some soil propriety that can be use to indicate the quality of the soil and give a number of information for the soil conservation and the water management. This study show an example of the determination of this parameter in three sites (forest site, after fire forest site and mixed site) by the use of the mini disk infiltrometer test (MDIT) in the small watershed of wadi Tifiles situated in the North West of Algeria that is characterized by a Mediterranean climate. The result show that the water repellency affect namely the after fire forest site which can be equal to 100% of the measured sample flowed by the mixed soil by 93% and the forest site by 80%.
Boelhouwers, J.C., De Graaf, P.J., and Samsodien, M.A. 1996. The influence of wildfire on soil properties and hydrological response at Devil’s Peak, Cape Town, South Africa: Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie, Suppl.-Bd. 107, p.1-10.
Brandt, G.H. 1969. Water movement in hydrophobic soils. Proc. Symp. Water Repellent Soils. Univ. Calif., Riverside, CA, pp. 91–115.
Campbell, R.E., Baker, M.B., Jr., Elliot, P.F., Larson, F.R., and Avery, C.C. 1977, Wildfire effects on a ponderosa pine ecosystem– an Arizona case study: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colo., U.S.D.A. Forest Service Research Paper RM-191, 12 p.
De Bano, L.F. Neary, D.G. Elliott, P.F. 1998. Fire’s Effects on Ecosystems. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., ISBN 978-0-471-16356-5, New York. 333 p.
Doerr, S.H., Shakesby, R.A., and Walsh, R.P.D. 1998, Spatial variability of soil hydrophobicity in fire-prone Eucalyptus and pine forests, Portugal: Soil Scince, v. 163, no.4, p. 313-324.
Doerr, S. H., Thomas, A. D. 2000. The role of soil moisture in controlling water repellency: New evidence from forest soils in Portugal, J. Hydrol., 231– 232, 134– 147, doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00190-6.
Hallett P. D. 2008. A Brief Overview of the Causes, Impacts and Amelioration of Soil Water Repellency – a Review Soil & Water Res., 3, 2008 (Special Issue 1): S21–S29
King, P.M. 1981. Comparison of methods for measuring severity of water repellence of sandy soils and assessment of some factors that affect its measurement, Aust. J. Soil Res., 19, 275– 285, doi:10.1071/SR9810275.
Meeuwig, R.O. 1970. Sheet erosion on intermountain summer ranges. United States
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Intermountain Forest Range Experimental
Station, Ogden, UT, Research Paper INT-85.
Robichaud , P.R. Beyers, J.L. Neary, D.G. 2000. Evaluating the effectiveness of post fire rehabilitation treatments. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-63. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture,Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 85 p.
Robichaud, P.R. Lewis, S.A. Ashmun, L.E. 2008. New procedure for sampling infiltration to assess post-fire soil water repellency. Res. Note. RMRS-RN-33. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 14 p.
Shakesby, R.A. Doerr, S.H. Walsh, R.P.D. 2000. The erosional impact of soil hydrophobicity: Current problems and future research directions. Hydrol. J. pp. 231-232.
Tillman,W. Scotter, D.R., Wallis, M.G. Clothier, B.E.1989. Water-repellency and its measurement by using intrinsic sorptivity. Aust. J. Soil Res. 27: 637-644.
Copyright (c) 2019 Abderrahmane KESSAISSIA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means whether specified Comunicata Scientiae, author(s), volume, pages and year. The authors are responsible for all the statements and concepts contained in the article.